The old saying goes “opposites attract”, but getting them to live happily together is another thing. This applies to the opposite dimensions within ourselves as much as it does to our love and family relationships. We call these pairs of opposite qualities “polarities” and we tend to value one of them over the other, depending on who we are and what’s important to us. These beliefs are generally shaped by what our parents, teachers, and society at large says are good and bad about us, and we adapt to them. So we make judgements about opposites like light/dark, extroverted/introverted, mind/body, logic/intuition, masculine/feminine, thinking/feeling etc. Indeed, a lot of our education system and workplaces tend to value and encourage one polarity over the other (light-extroverted-mind-logic-thinking over dark-introverted-body-intuition-feeling ie. the archetypal “masculine” traits over the archetypal “feminine’ traits).
Seeing them as opposite states or skill sets inclines us to think we must choose one over the other. Seldom do we look at them as expressing opposite ends of a continuum, along which we can move back and forth, and which all together embodies something much larger and dynamically harmonious. We tend to see and experience them as conflicting dualities rather than as a dynamic unity. Eastern spiritual thought and the mystical approaches to Western religions recognise that fundamental duality thinking (with its good/bad moral judgements) is limiting. The key is to expand how we see and experience ourselves, and our world, to embrace a more wholistic and balanced approach.
By allowing ourselves to explore what each “opposite” has to offer us when we look at a situation, judge another’s behaviour, prepare to make a decision, create policies that impact other’s lives etc we have access to a richer and wider range of “information” (factual, logical, emotional, intuitive, body sensing). Hopefully, this means we can make choices for ourselves, and others, that are more beneficial to the whole of who we are, not just a small part of who we are. Hopefully, this means we can have more tolerance and compassion for those who are “not like us”. We can value the dreamer, the quiet one, the emotional one etc as much as the logical and clever one, the social one, the go-getter one etc And, hopefully, this means we can value all these aspects within ourselves, for they are there even if seldom used or recognised.
We can have both and learn to use them well in partnership with each other, knowing that different circumstances at different times call for different balancings between these “polarities”. There is an art to this balancing act, and it is a dynamic one that requires curiosity, compassion, tolerance, love and commitment to ourselves and to others. It is challenging because we have to give up needing to be absolutely right about everything, and we need to give up ignoring the needs and desires of the under-valued parts of ourselves. There are often many rights, depending on the viewpoint you adopt. The question is what is right and best for you now, and for the whole of who you are? Is it what is really right for you, or is it what you have been trained to think is right for you?
Distinguishing between these different modes of knowing may not be easy at first. So if you are not sure how to begin you could try asking yourself to respond honestly from each of the following perspectives: I think (such and such about this issue), I believe (such and such about this issue), I feel (such and such about this issue), I know (etc), I sense (etc), I imagine (etc).
You could practise on the smaller things in your life, and bring a sense of play and exploration to it. You could think of it as a creative and collaborative dance between the different parts of yourself rather than a competition for dominance. Then you can work your way up to the more significant issues in your life. After all, it takes time to develop new skills and internal pathways of knowing yourself more completely.
